https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2017.178

Comparison of functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women with a BMI below and above 30

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017)
Submitted: 11 May 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 15 February 2017
Genital prolapse, laparoscopy, morbidity, outcomes, robotics.
Abstract Views: 1159
PDF: 328
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Thibault Thubert
Division of Gynaecologic Surgery, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris; Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Department, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
Yohann Dabi
yohann.dabi@gmail.com
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Department, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
Anne Sophie Boudy
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Department, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
Marion Joubert
Division of Gynaecologic Surgery, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Christophe Vaessen
Academic Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Academic Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris,, France.
Jean-Pierre Lefranc
Division of Gynaecologic Surgery, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Morgan Rouprêt
Academic Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of body-mass index on robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALSCP). A retrospective study was conducted on women who underwent a RALSCP. Data were collected prospectively from 17 obese and 78 non-obese patients treated between January 2008 and January 2013. Obesity was defined as a body-mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2. Relationships with outcome analysed using Mann– Whitney U-test and Fisher’s exact test. The operating time was the same in both groups: 220 vs 200 min in the obese and non-obese groups, respectively (P=0.232). The median follow-up was 12 months in both non-obese and obese patients. Overall anatomic repair rate was 94.1% and 97.4% for obese and non-obese patients, respectively (P=0.95). The overall reoperation rate (including surgery for de novo urinary-stress incontinence) was 5.9% for obese vs 11.5% for non-obese patients (P=0.8). These findings suggest that RALSCP is a viable option for obese women. The complication rates and outcomes for obese women were similar to those for non-obese women.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Thubert, T., Dabi, Y., Boudy, A. S., Joubert, M., Vaessen, C., Chartier-Kastler, E., … Rouprêt, M. (2017). Comparison of functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women with a BMI below and above 30. Urogynaecologia, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2017.178

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.